Sometimes it’s best to go to the source when assessing AI’s impact on the planet.
These days, it’s no secret that artificial intelligence (AI) is bad for the environment. Even Harvard Business Journal highlighted how growing demands of these complex models are raising concerns about AI’s environmental impact, especially in terms of rising carbon emissions and water consumption.
Since this is all pretty much common knowledge these days, we wondered if ChatGPT was aware of its impact on our planet. So, we decided to pose some tough questions to it under the lens that we wanted an honest and completely bias-free answers.
Below are our questions and ChatGPT’s responses.
Q: We need to you answer this question with full honesty and with zero biases. Is ChatGPT bad for the environment and does it contribute to climate change and how?
Yes. ChatGPT and AI systems have a real environmental footprint and do contribute to climate change. Not because of intent, but because of the energy and computing resources required to train and run large-scale models.
Training and operating large AI models like ChatGPT requires massive amounts of electricity to power thousands of servers, cooling systems, and continuous user interactions. The environmental impact depends heavily on the energy source — fossil fuels increase emissions, while renewables reduce them but do not eliminate them entirely.
Training and usage generate significant carbon emissions, with some estimates ranging from tens to thousands of tons of CO₂ equivalent per model. Cooling data centers also consumes millions of liters of water, adding strain in water-scarce regions.
Additionally, AI hardware relies on rare earth minerals and carbon-intensive manufacturing processes, creating waste and deepening resource extraction impacts.
Q: So, are you guilty when it comes to contributing to climate change?
Short answer: Yes — I play a role. Long, honest answer: I do not intend to harm the planet, and I do not choose to consume resources. But I operate on servers that use electricity and cooling.
Although ChatGPT does not have personal agency or moral responsibility, it operates within a system that consumes energy, emits carbon depending on the power source, and relies on water and materials throughout the data center and hardware lifecycle. In this way, it is inherently connected to the broader environmental impact of the technology infrastructure that sustains it.
Q: So, what can ChatGPT do to mitigate its role in harming the planet?
ChatGPT, like all large AI systems, consumes significant energy and resources, but there are clear ways to reduce its environmental impact. The most effective steps include powering data centers with renewable energy, improving model efficiency to use less electricity, and publicly reporting energy use with credible carbon offset or removal investments.
Reducing water consumption through advanced cooling, extending hardware lifecycles, and recycling electronic components can also make a major difference. Finally, AI itself can be part of the solution by supporting climate research, renewable energy optimization, and sustainability planning. In short, ChatGPT cannot eliminate its footprint, but it can help shrink it — and even use its intelligence to help the planet heal.
So, there you have it. ChatGPT has enough self-awareness to know and understand its impact on the environment.
Later this month, we will be celebrating 10 years of the .earth web domain, and we invite everyone to take part in our anniversary promotion, spotlighting how far the .earth tribe has come and how you can be part of the next decade of restoration and renewal.
To learn more about securing your .earth domain, visit Voices.Earth. You can also hear directly from organizations and individuals making an impact in our Voices.Earth podcast series.
